What kind of financial framework would help EU towards a genuine sustainability?

In my blog post from July 3I wrote about the reflection paper on the future of EU finances recently issued by the Commission. Out of five possible future scenarios the only one worth further discussion apperars to be the fourth one, so called “radical re-design”. This is however not really radical but just a bunch of small steps into more or less right direction. Therefore let us make one step futher and draft a proposal for financing real transition to sustainable Europe. This can be called scenario 4.1. “Financing sustainable Europe. Radical re-desing – really”. This blog is mostly about sustainable agriculture, therefore this part shall be drafted with slightly more detail.

General trend

1. Payments planned only for financing provision of public goods of European significance that are not sufficiently paid for by the markets.
2. Share of cohesion policy and common agricultural policy reduced.
3. Focus on future challenges for Europe.


Expenditure

Common agricultural policy
1. Direct payments in their present form, so called national envelopes and two-pillar structure of the policy abolished.
2. Focus on farmers providing public goods who would not survive on an open market without the subsidies (including when appropriate small farms and unfavourable areas).
3. Measures to decrease dependency of EU agriculture on mineral ferlisers, pesticides, fossil fuels and imported fodder.
4. Speeding up transition to circular economy, especially by means of increase in organic farming; support for transition to organic production, and if needed (not enough profitablity on the market) also to continued organic farming.
5. High nature value farming, especially management and restoration of semi-natural meadows and pastures secured on the scale needed for conservation of European biological and landscape diversity, with well-targeted support measures in place.
6. Genetic resources of European agriculture (plant varieties and animal breeds) efficiently conserved and sustably used, with necessary support made available.
7. Budget of agri-environment and -climate measures increased so as to make possible a palette of measures including both broad and more narrowly targeted measures.
8. Provision of same kind of public goods paid same support across EU unless clear differences in costs would occur, in which case the payment will be based on real costs.

Environment
Based on the experiences from LIFE programme sufficient funding for the environmental policy will be established.


Energy, industry and transport
Only projects with sufficent potential for significant EU-scale reduction of fossil fuel use and hence decrease of carbon dioxide emissions, and drive production towards circular economy will be supported.


Innovation
1. Support for research helping to wean society from fossil fuels, mineral fertilisers as well as pesticides, biocides and other dangerous chemicals.
2. Support for research in conservation and sustainable use of biodiveristy.


Econimic, social and teeritorial cohesion
1. Support to poorer regions and cross-border cooperation.
2. Focus on social inclusion, employment, skills, innovation, climate change, energy and environmental transition.


New priorities
More efficient support for sustainable development globally, including in the source countries of migration.

Revenue

1. Simplification of current system, including abolishing all rebates.
2. Establishing EU-wide environmental taxes on carbon dioxide, mineral nitrogen, taxes on most commonly used pesticides.
3. Introducing tax on international financial transaction if needed to finance EU priority expenditure.

An after-thought


Actually the proposed changes are not radical at all, they just constitute some common-sense ideas about stopping waste of money and starting financing activities necessary to secure our common future.

Post author: Aleksei Lotman

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

PRESS RELEASE: European Union’s agricultural policy needs a significant change

Image
Environmental and agricultural organisations, farmers, scientists, officials and other participants attended a conference on 1st and 2nd of September in Tallinn and Matsalu to discuss the future of the EU’s common agricultural policy (CAP). Despite their versatile background, most speakers found that the CAP requires significant changes. Multiple participants signed an open letter addressed to the Agriculture and Fisheries Council of the European Union and other relevant EU decision-makers with their proposals how to repair the policy. Speakers at the conference stressed the importance of agriculture in providing food and various public goods. At the same time negative sides of the present-day agriculture like impact on water, problems with pesticides, biodiversity loss, hardship faced by family farms and land grabbing were discussed. Positive examples of dealing with these problems were also presented. The overall conclusion shared by most speakers, however, was that CAP does secur
Read more

European Commission briefing on CAP future in Tallinn

The Commission presented the CAP future communication “The Future of Food and Farming” in Tallinn on 14 th of December. Not much new info compared to what one can get from the reading of the document could be obtained. Some minor clarifications and indeed confirmation of the initial impressions did result from attending the meeting though. The commission wants to maintain the two-pillar structure and seems to have support from the member states on that. This does not mean that environmental NGOs should stop saying that this system is obsolete and needs a radical reform but the real question at this stage seems to be how much money will go into which pillar. Since the financing is part of MFF, the Commission was adamant not to give a hint about this matter. For the NGO community there seems to a clear case for a strong stance on MFF: all the cuts resulting from Brexit must happen in Pillar I – no cuts to Pillar II. Meeting shed some additional light on programming bo
Read more

EKO: The near future must bring a turn towards greener agriculture

Image
Yesterday, on April 27th, the Estonian Chamber of Environmental Associations (EKO) sent a set of proposals to the Minister of Rural Affairs for the next seven-year cycle of agricultural policy. EKO emphasizes that Estonian agricultural subsidies of the new funding period must focus more on organic farming, preserving landscape biodiversity, preventing of water pollution and conservation of soil's good health and restoration of carbon sequestration. Edges of fields, which are rich in blooming plants, help to preserve the biodiversity of landscapes and the natural benefits that are important to farmers. Often, however, the field edges look the opposite as in this photo, made by Aveliina Helm (University of Tartu) EKO's proposals for a new period in agriculture are based on expert knowledge and increasing volume scientific analyzes of the environmental impact of European and Estonian agriculture. EKO acknowledges that many of the activities and grants planned for the new period ar
Read more